Writing portfolio

Complex science, made clear

Two treatments of computational neuroscience research: one written for curious general readers, the other for a technically informed audience.

One subject, two audiences

Writing that meets readers where they are

Good science writing is not simply about removing technical language. It is about understanding what matters, preserving accuracy and shaping the explanation around the people who will read it.

The samples below draw on peer-reviewed research that I co-authored into the computational modelling of early Alzheimer’s-related changes in the brain. Together, they show how the same research area can be communicated with very different levels of detail.

Featured work

Peer-reviewed foundations Both samples are based on research co-authored by Dr. Dasgupta.
Best Paper recognition The 2017 study received both Best Paper of the Session and Best Paper of the Conference at SocProS.
Research developed further The later work was published in IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics in 2026.

Project context

Research, implementation and communication

For the earlier project, I communicated the biological model, numerical method and research findings to Dr. Neil Buckley, who assisted with computational implementation and during preparation of the manuscript. The published chapter formally acknowledges his help.

Alongside my doctoral research, I worked as a Graduate Teaching Assistant at Liverpool Hope University from 2017 to 2019. That combination of research and teaching continues to shape how I explain technical ideas: accurately, supportively and with the reader or learner in mind.

Have research that needs the right words?

Whether you need a technical article, a clear explanation for a wider audience or thoughtful help shaping complex material, I would be glad to discuss it.

Start a writing enquiry